{"id":3202,"date":"2026-07-25T10:00:09","date_gmt":"2026-07-25T10:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/?p=3202"},"modified":"2026-07-25T10:00:09","modified_gmt":"2026-07-25T10:00:09","slug":"us-health-executives-weigh-in-on-vertical-integration-cost-of-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/?p=3202","title":{"rendered":"US health executives weigh in on vertical integration, cost of care"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div data-component=\"ArticleContent\">\n<div class=\"article__below-title\">\n<div class=\"mobile-trust-box\">\n<div class=\"row\">\n<div class=\"col-12 col-md-5 d-xl-none\">\n<div class=\"trust-box\">\n<div class=\"trust-box-logo d-none d-md-block\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/h5\/feature\/news\/publogos\/rheum.svg?la=en&amp;h=44&amp;w=141&amp;hash=EBAD778B57889935130139D3FF110538\" class=\"logo-img\" height=\"44\" alt=\"healio rheumatology logo\" width=\"141\"\/>\n          <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"col-12 col-md-6 offset-md-1 offset-xl-0 col-xl-12\">\n<div class=\"email-alert-button-wrapper d-none\" data-component=\"EmailTopicAlert\" data-module=\"Subspecialty Email Topic Alerts Top\" data-manage-email-link=\"\/footer\/account-information\/my-account\/email-subscriptions-and-alerts#emailAlerts\">\n  <hidden data-setting-item=\"d265901d-6d37-49c7-a8f6-c7bf19a02509\"\/><br \/>\n  <hidden data-crm-source=\"Subspecialty Topic Alert\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"email-alert-button d-none\" data-topic-button=\"not-subscribed\">\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n      <span data-module-track-action=\"Email Alerts TOP_Click_Healio News Article\" data-module-track-label=\"Email Alerts TOP_Healio News Article\">&#13;<br \/>\n        <i class=\"fas fa-plus-circle\"\/>&#13;<br \/>\n        Add topic to email alerts&#13;<br \/>\n      <\/span>&#13;\n    <\/p>\n<div class=\"email-alert-inner collapse u561ca9f39ee34e658c6882205dee1b90\">\n<div class=\"email-alert-dialogue\">\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n          Receive an email when new articles are posted on <span data-content=\"topic-title\"\/>&#13;\n        <\/p>\n<div class=\"d-none\" data-sign-up-type=\"unknown\">\n          Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on <span data-content=\"topic-title\"\/>.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>      <button type=\"button\" class=\"btn btn-primary\" data-loading-text=\"Loading &lt;i class=\" fa=\"\" fa-spinner=\"\" fa-spin=\"\">&#8220;&#13;<br \/>\n              data-action=&#8221;subscribe&#8221;&gt;&#13;<br \/>\n        Subscribe&#13;<br \/>\n      <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"d-none\" data-topic-modal=\"failed\">    <strong>We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact <a href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260723\/mailto:customerservice@slackinc.com\">customerservice@slackinc.com<\/a>.<\/strong>  <\/p>\n<p><button data-dismiss=\"modal\" class=\"btn btn-primary btn-lg btn-block\">Back to Healio<\/button><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Key takeaways:<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>More than 60% of executives said specialty pharmacy optimization will have the greatest impact on their business.<\/li>\n<li>Nearly half said payer-provider integration will impact coordination of care for patients.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Executives from the largest U.S. health care payers cited proactive management of high-risk patients, biosimilar use and site-of-care steerage as their top tactics to <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/primary-care\/20260129\/qa-burdensome-health-care-costs-far-more-common-than-previous-analyses-estimated\" id=\"rId11\" target=\"_blank\">lower care costs<\/a>, according to a survey from Spherix Global Insights.<\/p>\n<p>Spherix surveyed 27 decision-makers from nine of the leading managed care organizations and <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/primary-care\/20260605\/will-new-reforms-fix-the-fundamentally-broken-pharmacy-benefit-manager-system\" id=\"rId12\" target=\"_blank\">pharmacy benefit managers<\/a> (PBMs) in the United States: UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, Cigna, Kaiser Permanente, Elevance Health, Humana, Health Care Service Corporation, Molina Healthcare, and Centene Corporation. The respondents included directors of pharmacy, planning and network strategy, along with vice presidents of pharmacy strategy and chief medical officers. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"figure article__og-image\">&#13;\n    <picture>&#13;<source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.healio.comhttps:\/\/www.healio.comhttps:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/misc\/infographics\/2026\/rh0726broadwell_graphic_01.webp?w=476\" media=\"(max-width: 768px)\">&#13;<source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/misc\/infographics\/2026\/rh0726broadwell_graphic_01.webp?w=800\" media=\"(max-width: 992px)\">&#13;<source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/misc\/infographics\/2026\/rh0726broadwell_graphic_01.webp?w=595\" media=\"(max-width: 1200px)\">&#13;<source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.healio.comhttps:\/\/www.healio.comhttps:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/misc\/infographics\/2026\/rh0726broadwell_graphic_01.webp?w=476\" media=\"(min-width: 1200px)\">&#13;<source srcset=\"https:\/\/www.healio.comhttps:\/\/www.healio.comhttps:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/misc\/infographics\/2026\/rh0726broadwell_graphic_01.webp?w=476\">&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<br \/>\n      <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/misc\/infographics\/2026\/rh0726broadwell_graphic_01.jpg?w=800\" alt=\"RH0726Broadwell_Graphic_01\" class=\"figure-img img-fluid\" width=\"800\"\/>&#13;<br \/>\n    <\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>&#13;<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">&#13;<br \/>\n      &#13;<br \/>\n    <\/figcaption>&#13;<br \/>\n  <\/figure>\n<p>\u201cThe purpose of this study is to get a deep understanding of the top nine payers in the U.S. market today and highlight how each approaches the market differently,\u201d <b>Sybil Mead,<\/b> vice president of market access at Spherix Global Insights, told Healio. \u201cThe mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology is best to get us beyond the publicly available financial and other secondary-sourced information, to the nuance of strategy and outlook directly from the decision-makers\u2019 perspectives.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"mug left\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/slack-news\/rheumatology\/mugs\/m\/mead_sybil_2026.jpg?h=106&amp;w=80\" style=\"width: 80px; height: 106px;\" alt=\"Sybil Mead\"\/><\/p>\n<p><strong><b>Sybil Mead<\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>The survey was meant to detail specific areas of the <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260709\/regulate-or-ban-experts-debate-future-of-directtoconsumer-drug-advertising\" id=\"rId13\" target=\"_blank\">U.S. health care market<\/a>, including positioning, growth strategy, partnerships and engagement with biopharmaceutical companies, and future drivers, according to Mead. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe volume of these top payers is compelling for drug access,\u201d she said. \u201cLarge leading payers, serving the most significant number of insured individuals, set the scene for business priorities and innovations across the industry. These leading nine payers have distinct operating models with different approaches to integration, pharmacy management and growth.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Relationships and partnerships between payers and industry can shape real-world prescribing patterns, sometimes as much or more than clinical guidelines do, according to <b>Aaron Broadwell, MD,<\/b> assistant professor at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is critically important for physicians to understand how payers view the health care system, because payers increasingly influence the environment in which we actually deliver care,\u201d he said in an interview. \u201cClinical evidence tells us what treatments can work, but coverage policies, prior authorization, formularies, site-of-care requirements, network design and reimbursement policies often determine whether and how a patient actually receives that treatment.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The survey results can offer important insight into the incentives driving those decisions, he added. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cPayer executives are clearly thinking about total cost of care, specialty drug spending, <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20220214\/vertical-integration-secures-pbms-as-arsonists-and-firefighters-of-drug-prices\" id=\"rId14\" target=\"_blank\">vertical integration<\/a>, analytics and automation,\u201d Broadwell said, advising that the clinical community should not be left out of these conversations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA policy that looks efficient on a spreadsheet frequently has unintended consequences at the patient level,\u201d he said. \u201cThe best outcomes are going to come when payer data and economic expertise are combined with the experience of clinicians who understand what happens to actual patients when access is delayed, treatment is changed, or care is fragmented.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A close examination of the survey responses, including the opinions expressed on integration of care between payers and providers, could shed light on whether those outcomes can be achieved.<\/p>\n<h2>\u2018Changing the basic infrastructure\u2019<\/h2>\n<p>As part of the survey, respondents were asked about the impacts of integration of care between payers and providers. Results showed that 48% of respondents said it would impact coordination of care for patients, while 44% each reported that it would impact the ability to influence site-of-care decisions for specialty medications and the integration of health care services across care. Further data showed that 41% of respondents suggested that integration would impact negotiated provider reimbursement rates and medical pricing dynamics. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe greatest effects of integration are not necessarily traditional formulary decisions,\u201d Broadwell said. \u201cThey are coordination of care, site-of-care decisions, integration of services, and provider reimbursement and pricing. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat tells me vertical integration is changing the basic infrastructure through which care is delivered,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Integration creates potential conflicts that payers need to acknowledge, according to Broadwell. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen the same corporate entity has influence over the health plan, the PBM, the specialty pharmacy and portions of the provider network, a decision about where a patient receives a medication or which channel supplies it may have both clinical and financial implications,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have to be careful not to assume that moving a patient to an affiliated site or pharmacy is automatically synonymous with better coordination or lower total cost, but we can be sure it is what is the most profitable for the insurer.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>These are not the best metrics to assess the effectiveness of a health care strategy, according to Broadwell. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe appropriate measure of successful integration is not how much care is captured within an organization\u2019s own ecosystem,\u201d he said. \u201cThe measure should be whether patients have better outcomes, more timely access, less fragmentation and a lower true total cost of care, not more profit for the insurance plan.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The data may speak less about patient care than they do about control of the system, according to Mead. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn general, payers have embraced vertical integration to expand control across the care continuum, with increased investment in provider assets, specialty pharmacy and data capabilities,\u201d she said. \u201cThese moves are enabling tighter coordination between medical and pharmacy benefits, and more influence over access and utilization decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This can have implications at the systemic and individual level, according to Mead. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen providers are owned by or affiliated with the payer, clinical decisions will be tightly aligned with financial decisions,\u201d she said. \u201cOwned physicians are much more likely to be compliant with formularies and pathways than non-owned providers.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>For independent providers, losing site-of-care control is much more of an issue than formulary pressure from payers, Mead added. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIndependent specialists risk referral and buy-and-bill revenue erosion as payer-owned networks capture more of the specialty care pathway, even though they are largely exempt from the formulary-compliance tracking their employed peers face,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Mead also suggested that vertical integration turns provider reimbursement from a negotiated cost into a management lever. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt may also become a way to move where profit shows up on the books,\u201d she said. \u201cThis can impact how medical loss ratio can be calculated because the payer can pay the rate for a claim as an intercompany transfer and not a market negotiation. This gives payer-owned groups the flexibility a non-integrated payer does not have.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All these changes in the health care system could impact the total cost of care.<\/p>\n<h2>\u2018Identify the patients at greatest risk\u2019<\/h2>\n<p>Total cost of care (TCOC) is becoming a central organizing shift in how payers are thinking about drug coverage, \u201cat least in theory,\u201d according to Mead.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cToday, 30% say their benefit design philosophy is primarily TCOC-driven, and this percentage will increase to 56% in 3 years,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, 54% of survey respondents suggested that identifying and proactively managing high-risk members is a way of reducing total cost of care, while 46% suggested <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260528\/biologics-coordinators-administrative-complexity-drive-treatment-choice-in-rheumatology\" id=\"rId15\" target=\"_blank\">increasing biosimilar and generic use<\/a>, and 42% noted site-of-care steerage as leading strategies to address TCOC.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne of the most encouraging findings is that the leading strategy was proactively identifying and managing high-risk patients,\u201d Broadwell said. \u201cThat is an area in which physicians and payers should have tremendous common ground. In rheumatology, there is a major difference between the cost of treating a controlled patient and the total downstream cost of poorly controlled inflammatory disease.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, Broadwell was less enthusiastic about some of the other methods of controlling total cost of care.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe next several priorities show that payers are also concentrating on cost levers that they can implement relatively quickly,\u201d he said. \u201cMy caution is that we should not confuse reducing one line item with reducing total cost of care. A lower drug acquisition cost is meaningful, but it is not the entire equation. If a formulary change, site-of-care mandate or utilization management policy delays effective treatment, disrupts a stable patient or fragments care, the apparent short-term savings may often be offset by other medical costs and worse outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am not opposed to biosimilars or lower-cost sites of care,\u201d Broadwell added. \u201cI am opposed to assuming that the lowest unit price is automatically the lowest total cost of care. Those are not always the same thing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A companion issue is that biosimilars have led to mandatory switching of medications, which can lead to gaps in care and subsequent loss of response for patients, according to Broadwell. <\/p>\n<p>These patients may additionally lose copay assistance, he said. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe real opportunity is to take the first finding seriously: Identify the patients at greatest risk, get them to the right treatment efficiently, improve adherence and persistence, and then measure the entire patient journey,\u201d Broadwell. \u201cThat is a more meaningful TCOC strategy than simply moving cost from one column of the health plan\u2019s budget to another.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The shift toward TCOC measurement in the arena of drug access exposes individual providers to financial risk-sharing, according to Mead. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cProvider value-based arrangements are important to payers, but actual risk-sharing penetration lags,\u201d she said. \u201cIn cases where risk-sharing does occur with physicians, pharmacy is often carved out of the risk calculation, meaning drug selection is omitted from any upside or downside potential.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mead added that when payers have value-based contracts with pharmaceutical companies for their drug products that may involve TCOC measures, their contracts would then not align well with the risk arrangements of the providers. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs a result, the incentive design does not necessarily change clinical behavior,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>However, provider behavior may change as innovative care models are adopted.<\/p>\n<h2>Specialty pharmacy optimization<\/h2>\n<p>\u201cInnovative care models are key future levers for cost and utilization control,\u201d Mead said. <\/p>\n<p>According to the Spherix survey, <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20241121\/you-can-have-much-more-control-the-rise-of-in-house-specialty-pharmacies\" id=\"rId16\" target=\"_blank\">specialty pharmacy<\/a> optimization was reported as a key innovative care model by 63% of respondents, while 58% suggested dynamic utilization management and 48% cited TCOC-driven formulary and benefit design.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cVirtual care and remote patient monitoring are much lower despite that being a patient and physician priority,\u201d Broadwell said.<\/p>\n<p>This sends a clear message to clinicians, according to Broadwell. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cFrom the payer perspective, the next wave of innovation is largely about making management of care more sophisticated, more data-driven and more dynamic,\u201d he said. \u201cThat is not inherently good or bad. The question is how the tools are used.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Broadwell offered an example of how those tools might be used. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cPredictive analytics could help identify a patient with rheumatoid arthritis who is repeatedly requiring corticosteroids, has poor medication persistence or is at high risk for hospitalization,\u201d he said. \u201c<a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260611\/ai-scribes-lead-physicians-to-see-friend-in-the-exam-room-or-sleep-with-one-eye-open\" id=\"rId17\" target=\"_blank\">AI and automation<\/a> could also eliminate repetitive prior authorization work and approve straightforward cases in real time. Those would be meaningful improvements.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, advancement often comes with tradeoffs, according to Broadwell. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe concern is that the same technology could be used to create increasingly complex restrictions, apply rigid population-level rules to individual patients or automate denials at scale,\u201d he said. \u201cThe goal should be to use technology to eliminate unnecessary friction and help patients receive appropriate treatment more efficiently, not simply make utilization management more technologically sophisticated.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to Broadwell, the formula for innovation in medical care should be straightforward. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI would define successful innovation as getting the right patient to the right therapy sooner, supporting adherence, monitoring outcomes and intervening before disease activity produces irreversible damage or expensive downstream care,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Mead also had some reservations about these data points, particularly regarding the field of rheumatology. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor rheumatology, this is a direct threat to a real revenue line for physicians \u2014 drug margin on administered specialty products \u2014 and adds the logistical burden of coordinating drug delivery, storage and waste management for products the practice no longer procures itself,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>The data set contains other key messages for rheumatologists in particular.<\/p>\n<h2>\u2018Should not surrender\u2019<\/h2>\n<p>According to Mead, rheumatology likely will become a larger management target for leading payers, \u201cat least without a value-based contracting framework to channel that pressure into partnership rather than pure restriction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTiming is important as pharmaceutical companies in rheum have a window to shape outcomes-based\/risk-sharing models before payers default to blunt tools like stricter prior authorization and step therapy, which are already broadly applied,\u201d she said. \u201cSo, rheumatology\u2019s most useful angle is the gap between rising payer scrutiny and the current absence of value-based contracting infrastructure to match it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rheumatology ranks fourth among therapeutic areas where payers report planning to increase disease-management focus over the next 3 years, at 40.7%, according to Mead. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt also ties for the second-highest tier of specialty areas payers are targeting for vertical integration\/acquisition, at 25.9%,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>However, Mead also noted that outcomes-based contracting in rheumatology is nearly nonexistent today. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cOnly 7.7% of payers currently have an outcomes-based contracting in place for rheumatology, which is tied for the lowest,\u201d she said. \u201cEven looking out 3 years, 53.8% of payers still say they have no plans to implement one. With the introduction of cell and immune reset therapies poised to come to rheumatology in the coming year, there may be more focus on innovation in disease management and contracting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of the payer data, Broadwell counseled rheumatologists to keep patient care their first priority.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPhysicians should not surrender the concept of value to payers or manufacturers,\u201d he said. \u201cWe know our patients, we understand the consequences of delayed and fragmented care, and we should be active participants in defining both outcomes and total cost of care.\u201d <\/p>\n<h2>For more information:<\/h2>\n<p>      <b>Aaron Broadwell, MD,<\/b> can be reached at <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260723\/mailto:ABroadwell@rosdrs.com\" id=\"rId18\" target=\"_blank\">ABroadwell@rosdrs.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>      <b>Sybil Mead<\/b> can be reached at <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260723\/mailto:sybil.mead@spherixglobalinsights.com\" id=\"rId19\" target=\"_blank\">sybil.mead@spherixglobalinsights.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n<div class=\"article__content--footer\">\n<div class=\"publisher-logo\">\n    <span>Published by:<\/span><br \/>\n    <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/~\/media\/h5\/feature\/news\/publogos\/rheum.svg?la=en&amp;h=44&amp;w=141&amp;hash=EBAD778B57889935130139D3FF110538\" class=\"logo-img\" height=\"44\" alt=\"healio rheumatology logo\" width=\"141\"\/>\n  <\/div>\n<div class=\"sources-references-disclosures\">\n<h3>Sources\/Disclosures<\/h3>\n<h2>References:<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"list-unstyled references\">\n<li>Spherix Global Insights; Key Account Dynamix. Comparative assessments: Leading payers. Published May 2026. Accessed June 2026.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"disclosures\">\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n        <strong> Disclosures: <\/strong>&#13;<br \/>\n        Broadwell and Mead report no relevant financial disclosures. &#13;\n      <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- Healio AI Widget --><\/p>\n<div class=\"healio-ai-component-inline\" data-no-ads=\"true\" data-module-track-category=\"Healio AI\" data-module-track-action=\"Click\" data-module-track-label=\"Access Healio Ai from component - News_AI Component - In-Content (all devices)\">\n<div class=\"healio-ai-content\">\n    <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/m3.healio.com\/~\/media\/images\/healio-ai\/healio-ai_logo.svg\" alt=\"Healio AI\" class=\"healio-ai-logo\"\/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ask a clinical question<\/strong> and tap into <strong>Healio AI&#8217;s knowledge<\/strong> base.<\/p>\n<ul>&#13;<\/p>\n<li>PubMed, enrolling\/recruiting trials, guidelines<\/li>\n<p>&#13;<\/p>\n<li>Clinical Guidance, Healio CME, FDA news<\/li>\n<p>&#13;<\/p>\n<li>Healio&#8217;s exclusive daily news coverage of clinical data<\/li>\n<p>&#13;\n    <\/ul>\n<p>    <button class=\"healio-ai-button\" onclick=\"window.location.href=\" https:=\"\">Learn more<\/button>\n  <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"email-alert-button-wrapper d-none\" data-component=\"EmailTopicAlert\" data-module=\"Subspecialty Email Topic Alerts Top\" data-manage-email-link=\"\/footer\/account-information\/my-account\/email-subscriptions-and-alerts#emailAlerts\">\n  <hidden data-setting-item=\"d265901d-6d37-49c7-a8f6-c7bf19a02509\"\/><br \/>\n  <hidden data-crm-source=\"Subspecialty Topic Alert\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"email-alert-button d-none\" data-topic-button=\"not-subscribed\">\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n      <span data-module-track-action=\"Email Alerts TOP_Click_Healio News Article\" data-module-track-label=\"Email Alerts TOP_Healio News Article\">&#13;<br \/>\n        <i class=\"fas fa-plus-circle\"\/>&#13;<br \/>\n        Add topic to email alerts&#13;<br \/>\n      <\/span>&#13;\n    <\/p>\n<div class=\"email-alert-inner collapse u561ca9f39ee34e658c6882205dee1b90\">\n<div class=\"email-alert-dialogue\">\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n          Receive an email when new articles are posted on <span data-content=\"topic-title\"\/>&#13;\n        <\/p>\n<div class=\"d-none\" data-sign-up-type=\"unknown\">\n          Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on <span data-content=\"topic-title\"\/>.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>      <button type=\"button\" class=\"btn btn-primary\" data-loading-text=\"Loading &lt;i class=\" fa=\"\" fa-spinner=\"\" fa-spin=\"\">&#8220;&#13;<br \/>\n              data-action=&#8221;subscribe&#8221;&gt;&#13;<br \/>\n        Subscribe&#13;<br \/>\n      <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"d-none\" data-topic-modal=\"failed\">    <strong>We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact <a href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260723\/mailto:customerservice@slackinc.com\">customerservice@slackinc.com<\/a>.<\/strong>  <\/p>\n<p><button data-dismiss=\"modal\" class=\"btn btn-primary btn-lg btn-block\">Back to Healio<\/button><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.healio.com\/news\/rheumatology\/20260723\/us-health-insurance-pbm-executives-weigh-in-on-vertical-integration-cost-of-care\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#13; &#13; &#13; Add topic to email alerts&#13; &#13; &#13; Receive an email when new articles are posted on &#13; Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on . &#8220;&#13; data-action=&#8221;subscribe&#8221;&gt;&#13; Subscribe&#13; We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com. Back to Healio Key takeaways: More than 60% of executives said specialty pharmacy optimization will have the greatest impact on their business. Nearly half said payer-provider integration will impact coordination of care for patients. Executives from the largest U.S. health care payers cited proactive management of high-risk patients, biosimilar use and site-of-care steerage as their top tactics to lower care costs, according to a survey from Spherix Global Insights. Spherix surveyed 27 decision-makers from nine of the leading managed care organizations and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in the United States: UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, Cigna, Kaiser Permanente, Elevance Health, Humana, Health Care Service Corporation, Molina Healthcare, and Centene Corporation. The respondents included directors of pharmacy, planning and network strategy, along with vice presidents of pharmacy strategy and chief medical officers. &#13; &#13;&#13;&#13;&#13;&#13;&#13; &#13; &#13; &#13;&#13; &#13; &#13; \u201cThe purpose of this study is to get a deep understanding of the top nine payers in the U.S. market today and highlight how each approaches the market differently,\u201d Sybil Mead, vice president of market access at Spherix Global Insights, told Healio. \u201cThe mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology is best to get us beyond the publicly available financial and other secondary-sourced information, to the nuance of strategy and outlook directly from the decision-makers\u2019 perspectives.\u201d Sybil Mead The survey was meant to detail specific areas of the U.S. health care market, including positioning, growth strategy, partnerships and engagement with biopharmaceutical companies, and future drivers, according to Mead. \u201cThe volume of these top payers is compelling for drug access,\u201d she said. \u201cLarge leading payers, serving the most significant number of insured individuals, set the scene for business priorities and innovations across the industry. These leading nine payers have distinct operating models with different approaches to integration, pharmacy management and growth.\u201d Relationships and partnerships between payers and industry can shape real-world prescribing patterns, sometimes as much or more than clinical guidelines do, according to Aaron Broadwell, MD, assistant professor at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. \u201cIt is critically important for physicians to understand how payers view the health care system, because payers increasingly influence the environment in which we actually deliver care,\u201d he said in an interview. \u201cClinical evidence tells us what treatments can work, but coverage policies, prior authorization, formularies, site-of-care requirements, network design and reimbursement policies often determine whether and how a patient actually receives that treatment.\u201d The survey results can offer important insight into the incentives driving those decisions, he added. \u201cPayer executives are clearly thinking about total cost of care, specialty drug spending, vertical integration, analytics and automation,\u201d Broadwell said, advising that the clinical community should not be left out of these conversations. \u201cA policy that looks efficient on a spreadsheet frequently has unintended consequences at the patient level,\u201d he said. \u201cThe best outcomes are going to come when payer data and economic expertise are combined with the experience of clinicians who understand what happens to actual patients when access is delayed, treatment is changed, or care is fragmented.\u201d A close examination of the survey responses, including the opinions expressed on integration of care between payers and providers, could shed light on whether those outcomes can be achieved. \u2018Changing the basic infrastructure\u2019 As part of the survey, respondents were asked about the impacts of integration of care between payers and providers. Results showed that 48% of respondents said it would impact coordination of care for patients, while 44% each reported that it would impact the ability to influence site-of-care decisions for specialty medications and the integration of health care services across care. Further data showed that 41% of respondents suggested that integration would impact negotiated provider reimbursement rates and medical pricing dynamics. \u201cThe greatest effects of integration are not necessarily traditional formulary decisions,\u201d Broadwell said. \u201cThey are coordination of care, site-of-care decisions, integration of services, and provider reimbursement and pricing. \u201cThat tells me vertical integration is changing the basic infrastructure through which care is delivered,\u201d he added. Integration creates potential conflicts that payers need to acknowledge, according to Broadwell. \u201cWhen the same corporate entity has influence over the health plan, the PBM, the specialty pharmacy and portions of the provider network, a decision about where a patient receives a medication or which channel supplies it may have both clinical and financial implications,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have to be careful not to assume that moving a patient to an affiliated site or pharmacy is automatically synonymous with better coordination or lower total cost, but we can be sure it is what is the most profitable for the insurer.\u201d These are not the best metrics to assess the effectiveness of a health care strategy, according to Broadwell. \u201cThe appropriate measure of successful integration is not how much care is captured within an organization\u2019s own ecosystem,\u201d he said. \u201cThe measure should be whether patients have better outcomes, more timely access, less fragmentation and a lower true total cost of care, not more profit for the insurance plan.\u201d The data may speak less about patient care than they do about control of the system, according to Mead. \u201cIn general, payers have embraced vertical integration to expand control across the care continuum, with increased investment in provider assets, specialty pharmacy and data capabilities,\u201d she said. \u201cThese moves are enabling tighter coordination between medical and pharmacy benefits, and more influence over access and utilization decisions.\u201d This can have implications at the systemic and individual level, according to Mead. \u201cWhen providers are owned by or affiliated with the payer, clinical decisions will be tightly aligned with financial decisions,\u201d she said. \u201cOwned physicians are much more likely to be compliant with formularies and pathways than non-owned providers.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3203,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3202\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drsoniafawad.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}